Microsoft Dynamics GP customization tools evolution ? overview for consultant Computers Articles | September 22 Mickey Mantle Jersey , 2005 This small article is targeted to Microsoft Dynamics GP audience. Recent Microsoft marketing move from Microsoft Business Solutions to Dynamics means Project Green wave 1 progress. This will mean increasing role of XML web services enabled as connectors to eConnect or Integration Object SDK.
This small article is targeted to Microsoft Dynamics GP audience. Recent Microsoft marketing move from Microsoft Business Solutions to Dynamics means Project Green wave 1 progress. This will mean increasing role of XML web services enabled as connectors to eConnect or Integration Object SDK. Let?s come to the subject. When Great Plains Software introduced the first graphical accounting application for Mac and Windows in the beginning of 1990th it had Great Plains Dexterity customization tool, IDE and programming language. Dexterity design was based on several longevity principles: Graphical platform independence and database platform independence and easy switch from one DB to the other among the most important ones. Dexterity was written as a shell in C programming language, which was ?platform independent? and at the same time very efficient in compilation (close to assembler). Since then we saw new tools and options:
Modifier with VBA. This tool allows you place custom buttons and editable fields on the forms and attach VBA scripts to these buttons and fields. Theoretically you can deploy ADO and make a call to the database, but typically this would be given to Dexterity programmer. Also Modifier can deal with ReportWriter report ? which is rarely used option Babe Ruth Jersey , but you should be aware of it. Another usufull feature - calling Crystal Reports engine from VBA, so you can print custom Crystal Report - Invoice from SOP Entry screen, instead of regular Report Writer SOP Invoice Form. Continuum for VB and Delphi. We do not touch obvious features of Continuum, but would like to mention its advanced use. First ? in Dexterity you can not easily target multiple modules (coming from different software vendors ? those days Intellisol Advanced Purchase Order Processing Derek Jeter Jersey , Project Accounting and ForeStar Fixed Assets). This feature could be addressed through Continuum generated VBA code with inclusion of Dexterity Scripts (Sanscript). The second nice feature of Continuum could be Great Plains Integration Manager custom apps, which allows you to switch Great Plains companies automatically and integrate the whole corporation during the night Dexterity SQL Support. When Great Plains CS+ was introduced on MS SQL Server 6.5 platform ? instead of using Dexterity cursors ? you could use the way more efficient stored procedures and simply call them from Dexterity code. The negative side of this was ? you can not have your custom piece running on Btrieve or Ctree platforms, where Dexterity cursors were the only way to work with the database Dexterity COM object support. This was new feature of Microsoft Great Plains Dexterity version 7.0. This feature allows you to call something nice, like web service from your COM object and in this case replace New York Yankees Jersey , say Great Plains tax engine with the one working from your web server, located in one place and serving numerous subscribers. eConnect. This tool was initially designed for eCommerce developer, who deploys Microsoft Great Plains as the back endERP. eConnect is SDK with SQL Stored Procedures and parameters descriptions. Extender. We?ll wait the next version ? but even now it is very promising and it doesn?t require you to be programmer to customize Great Plains. We encourage you to analyze your alternatives. You can always appeal to our help, give us a call: 1-866-528-0577 or 1-630-961-5918 Jay Bruce Jersey , help@albaspectrum
The advantage of Intrusion Detection System based on protocol analysis Computers Articles | October 15, 2010 There are many advantages, such as efficiency, performance Yoenis Cespedes Jersey ,? detection rate to false alarm rate, and etc. compare network intrusion detection system (IDS) based on protocol analysis with which based on simple pattern-matching.
There are many advantages, such as performance, efficiency Jacob deGrom Jersey , detection rate to false alarm rate, and etc. compare Intrusion Detection System (IDS) based on protocol analysis with which based on simple pattern-matching. Let's take example for HTTP protocol combines with the HTTP analyzer of Ax3soft Sax2 intrusion detection system. "GET scripts.. ..winntsystem32cmd.exe?c dir HTTP1.0" is a Unicode attack aim at IIS. The attack's first step is send out a request, like as "TCP dport:80", "content:' 'I" Noah Syndergaard Jersey , "alert:'IIS Unicode Directory Traversal' TCP dport:80", "content:'cmd.exe'I" and "alert:'Attempt to execute cmd'" via browser. The Intrusion Detection System (IDS) based on simple pattern-matching will detect the attack with the rules in following: 1) system will send an alarm of "IIS Unicode Traversal" if the caught TCP packets sent to Point 80 with the code " "(blank space). 2) system will send an alarm of "Attempt to execute cmd" if the caught TCP packets sent to Point 80 with the code "cmd.exe". Put aside the optimization this feature, there are two serious bugs in this kind IDS - misinformation and omission.? Misinformation? The IDS based on pattern-matching ignores two important aspects? whether the TCP connections have been setup and whether the matched string is legal. In fact, the later situation is more serious.
CwHamster - Forum
Thema drucken
03.12.2019 08:04
Antworten
